Submit to keep my country and its communities safe yes is it If some is slandering or belittling someone in public today the person usually reacts in violence or in just as belittling matter. If this was to happens in public today the police may be called to help come down the two parties if there was no violence ,but no arrested could be made and the conflict would continue and my turn in to a huge conflict with many people and cause acts of terrible violence on and from both parties. If we put a limit on what people can say about people or at least the way they could say it in public there would be less verbal and physical violence among our communities because would be less quick at the mouth because one wrong word could cause them jail time. Also if we put a limit on peoples freedom of speech then is would help home land security control on what can be announced into the international public; Our country secrets, it people, and our president would be a lot safer if we could put so locks on some of this countries loosed lipped officials who could expose us and jeopardize our nations safety.
The Rights of individuals accused of crimes are protected in many sections of the U. Article I affirms the right of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, in other words, the right to a court order that requires a judge to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause for keeping a person in jail.
The Principle of Due Process: Citizen accused of a crime. The rules can be complicated and always evolving.
The Fourth Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It also forbids double jeopardy — the act of bringing a person to trial a second time for the same crime.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This intended to prevent forced or involuntary confessions under police pressure. Clarence Earl Gideon could not afford counsel when he went to trial for breaking into a poolroom in Bay Harbor, Florida.
He was convicted and sent to prison, where he spent years researching his rights. Finally, he successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case.
In the ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court commanded that anyone and everyone, accused of a felony had to be provided counsel to assist in their defense. But again, what does the phrase really mean? Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
In general, states are allowed to pursue their own policies regarding capital punishment.
The Supreme Court did not challenge the death penalty until in Furman v. Even then, it did not judge capital punishment to be cruel and unusual punishment. It simply warned the states that the death penalty was to be carried out in a fair and consistent manner.The Rights and Freedoms of Americans (From: Hartley, William H., Vincent, William S..
American Civics.N.Y., , pp. 34ff) In drafting the Constitution, most of the Founding Fathers believed that the safeguards written into it would protect the rights of Americans.
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Tenth Amendment. Learn more about the American Civil Liberties Union and its affiliated organization, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation. Civil rights, on the other hand, are guarantees that government officials will treat people equally and that decisions will be made on the basis of merit rather than race, gender, or other personal characteristics.
Because of the Constitution’s civil rights guarantee, it is unlawful for a school or university run by a state government to treat students differently based on their race, ethnicity, age, sex, or national origin. civil liberties advocats concrns regarding the government use of drone drones may violate privacy rights and drones may obtain evidence for criminal investigations in unconstitutional ways Mapp v.
Civil rights, along with political rights, are widely viewed as making up the collection of human rights. The exact definition of civil rights is very broad.
The rights found in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, for example, can be seen as civil rights. The U.S. Constitution contains two Amendments pertaining to individual rights which are left up to the U.S.
Supreme Court for interpretation. Both the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment limit the F ederal G overnment and S tate governments to infringe upon individual rights and civil liberties of U.S.